03/10/14

Atheists want iconic 17-foot cross removed from 9/11 museum

Published March 09, 2014

FoxNews.com

Atheists are trying to oust the “Miracle Cross” from the 9/11 museum, arguing that its inclusion would violate the Constitution’s separation of church and state.

But Eric Baxster of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty told MyFoxNY that the cross is part of the story of 9/11 and that museums don’t censor history.

“They tell history as it happened,” Baxster said.

The 17-foot cross-shaped beam was discovered in the devastation at Ground Zero and became a symbol of comfort and hope after the horrific terrorist attack.

But the group American Atheists says the cross is a part of religious history and is challenging its inclusion in the new National Sept. 11 Memorial and Museum which opens in May.

“We’re arguing for equal treatment in some way, whatever that might be.”

– Edwin Kagin, attorney for American Atheists

The group said the cross should not be in a museum that is on Port Authority property and financed by taxpayers.

In arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan, American Atheists’ lawyer Edwin Kagin said his organization is seeking a similar object to be displayed at the museum, something like a plaque that would say “atheists died here, too,” the Religion News Servicereported.

“We’re arguing for equal treatment in some way, whatever that might be,” Kagin said after the hearing.

The museum’s lawyer, Mark Alcott, told the court that rescue workers took comfort in the cross and they prayed to it as a religious object.

“But there is a difference between displaying an artifact of historical significance and saying we want you [the public] to bless it — museum-goers understand that distinction” he said, according to London’s Telegraph newspaper.

The newspaper said Judge Reena Raggi appeared skeptical of the claims by the atheist group.

“There are countless cases of museums including religious artifacts among their exhibits and it’s going to be described in a way that talks about the history of the object, what is the problem here?” she said. “An argument has been made that you are trying to censor history.”

Construction worker Frank Silecchia discovered the beam in the smoldering wreckage of the World Trade Center towers. He told the “Today” show that the cross comforted him, and it soon became a rallying point for first responders, according to Religion News Service.

“I was already working 12 hours. I was quite weary and the cross comforted me,” Silecchia said. “I never stood here before any media and said it’s about religion. But I say it’s about faith — the faith that was crushed on 9/11.”

The cross will be part of a display that includes 1,000 artifacts in a 100,000-square-foot underground museum.

The appeals court is expected to make a decision in several months.

01/14/14

Britain grants landmark asylum to Afghan atheist

Britain grants landmark asylum to Afghan atheist

Every aspect of daily life in Afghanistan is permeated by Islam, so living discreetly would be virtually impossible, the spokeswoman said
AFP/Getty Images
  • Every aspect of daily life in Afghanistan is permeated by Islam, so living discreetly would be virtually impossible, the spokeswoman saidAFP/Getty Images
Published at 12:01AM, January 14 2014

An Afghan citizen has secured UK asylum for religious reasons despite being an atheist.

The case, believed to be the first of its kind, was submitted to the Home Office under the 1951 Refugee Convention on the basis that if he returned to Afghanistan he would face persecution because of his lack of religious belief.

Free legal support was provided by Kent Law Clinic, a pro bono service provided by students, supervised by lawyers from the University of Kent’s Law School, with help from local solicitors and barristers.

The man fled to the UK from a conflict involving his family in Afghanistan and was allowed to stay in Britain until 2013, a university spokeswoman said. He was brought up as a Muslim but after arriving in the UK, aged 16, in 2007, he turned to atheism, she said.

The case involved the Law Clinic lodging a submission with the Home Office, and including evidence that the man’s return to Afghanistan could result in a death sentence under Sharia as an “apostate” — someone who has abandoned religious faith — unless he remained discreet about his atheist beliefs.

Evidence showed that because every aspect of daily life and culture in Afghanistan is permeated by Islam, living discreetly would be virtually impossible, the spokeswoman said.